Is It Illegal to Harass a Fisherman? 2026 State Laws

Legally Explained
On: May 22, 2026 |
252 Views

Yes, it is illegal to harass a fisherman in most US states. Virtually every state has enacted specific angler harassment or interference with lawful fishing statutes that make it a criminal offense to obstruct, disrupt, or interfere with someone who is fishing legally. These laws exist separately from general harassment statutes and carry their own penalties.

This is a lesser-known area of US law that catches people off guard. Animal rights activists, recreational boaters, and even curious bystanders can unknowingly cross a legal line. In states like Florida, Texas, and California, the violation carries fines, possible misdemeanor charges, and even license revocation.

One misconception worth addressing immediately: many people believe that being near a fisherman or expressing disapproval of fishing is protected by the First Amendment. That’s only partially true. Speech near fishing activity is generally protected. Physical interference is not.

This article covers the full legal picture for 2026: what angler harassment laws say, which states have them, what the penalties are, and where the legal line between protest and criminal conduct actually falls.

Is It Illegal to Harass a Fisherman

Yes, harassing a fisherman is illegal in the vast majority of US states under specific angler harassment or interference with lawful fishing statutes. These laws make it a criminal offense to interfere with, obstruct, or disrupt someone engaged in lawful fishing activity.

The laws were enacted primarily in the 1980s and 1990s as a response to activists who physically disrupted hunters and anglers. By 2026, nearly every state has some version of this statute on the books, and enforcement has remained consistent across administrations and wildlife management philosophies.

The prohibition goes beyond simply being rude to a fisherman. The statutes target conduct that physically interferes with the fishing activity itself.

Key facts about fishing harassment laws in 2026:

  • Approximately 48 to 50 states have statutes covering interference with lawful hunting or fishing
  • The violation is typically a misdemeanor on a first offense
  • Fines range from $100 to $5,000 depending on the state
  • Some states add license revocation as an additional penalty
  • The fisherman being harassed must be engaged in lawful fishing (valid license, legal location)

The lawful fishing requirement matters. If the fisherman is poaching or fishing without a license, these statutes generally don’t apply to protect them. The laws exist to protect legal recreational and commercial fishing activity.

Is It Illegal to Harass Fisherman

Harassing fishermen is illegal across most of the United States under state-level angler and sportfishing protection laws. The conduct targeted by these laws includes physical obstruction, intimidation, and deliberate interference with fishing equipment or catch.

The laws are specifically designed for this context. General harassment statutes under criminal codes already exist, but angler harassment statutes are separate and go further in some ways. They criminalize conduct that might not meet the threshold for general criminal harassment, such as making loud noises to scare fish or blocking a fishing location.

This is a detail that trips people up. You don’t have to threaten a fisherman personally to violate these laws. Interfering with their activity in ways that don’t involve direct personal contact can still constitute a violation.

Examples of conduct that has resulted in charges under state angler harassment laws:

  • Kayakers repeatedly paddling through a fisherman’s casting area to disrupt fishing
  • Protesters using air horns or loud devices near active fishing locations
  • Individuals releasing fish from someone’s catch or live well
  • Persons physically blocking a fishing pier or boat launch
  • Individuals splashing water or using boat wakes deliberately to spoil a fishing spot

Each of these involves interference with the activity rather than direct personal threat. The statutes capture conduct that falls between “annoying” and “threatening” in the traditional criminal harassment sense.

Is It Illegal to Harass Someone

Under general US law, harassing someone means engaging in conduct that alarms, annoys, or threatens them in a way that a reasonable person would find distressing. General harassment statutes exist in all 50 states and typically require the conduct to be directed at a person rather than at their activity.

The distinction between general harassment law and angler harassment law is important. General harassment under state criminal codes focuses on the effect on the person: did they feel threatened, alarmed, or subjected to conduct with no legitimate purpose? The conduct must be directed at the individual.

Angler harassment statutes operate differently. They focus on interference with the activity itself. You don’t have to threaten or alarm the fisherman personally. Disrupting their ability to fish is enough.

Law TypeFocusConduct RequiredExamples
General harassment statuteEffect on the personMust alarm, threaten, or intimidateFollowing, threatening, repeated unwanted contact
Angler harassment statuteInterference with activityDisrupting lawful fishingBlocking access, scaring fish, releasing catch
Disorderly conductPublic orderCreating unreasonable disturbanceYelling, fighting, creating a public scene
TrespassProperty accessBeing on property without permissionEntering private fishing areas

A person near a public fishing area can potentially violate angler harassment law without meeting the legal standard for general criminal harassment. That’s the practical significance of the separate statute.

Key Takeaway: Angler harassment laws are distinct from general harassment law and criminalize interference with fishing activity itself, meaning you can violate them without personally threatening or alarming the fisherman as an individual.

What Is Angler Harassment Law

Angler harassment law refers to state statutes that specifically prohibit interfering with, obstructing, or disrupting a person engaged in lawful hunting or fishing activity. These laws are often called “hunter harassment laws” or “interference with lawful sporting activity” statutes, and they protect anglers alongside hunters.

 harass a fisherman

The legal framework was pioneered by states in the early 1980s, largely in response to organized efforts by animal rights groups to physically disrupt hunting and fishing. The statutes were crafted to address a gap: general criminal harassment law required direct personal conduct toward an individual, but activists were interfering with the activity without necessarily threatening the person.

Angler harassment statutes solve this by shifting the protected interest from the person’s physical safety to the person’s right to engage in lawful regulated activity. The fisherman’s right to fish legally becomes the legally protected interest.

The typical elements of an angler harassment statute:

  • The victim must be engaged in lawful fishing (valid license, legal location and method)
  • The defendant must take an intentional action
  • That action must interfere with, obstruct, or disrupt the fishing activity
  • The defendant does not have a recognized legal justification (such as being a law enforcement officer)

Most statutes do not require proof that the fisherman was prevented from catching fish. The interference itself is the violation. A person who repeatedly spooks fish in a fishing spot without actually stopping the fisherman from casting can still be charged in states with broadly written statutes.

Is It Illegal to Interfere with Someone Fishing

Yes, interfering with someone who is legally fishing is illegal under state angler harassment or interference with lawful sporting activity statutes in most US states. The conduct covered goes well beyond physical confrontation.

Interference is defined broadly in most state statutes. It includes physical obstruction of access to a fishing location, disruption of fishing equipment, intentional disturbance of the surrounding area, and conduct that impairs the fisherman’s ability to exercise their legal right to fish.

The requirement that fishing be “lawful” is the key qualifier. Interference with someone poaching or fishing out of season does not trigger these statutes in most states. The protection exists specifically for legal recreational and commercial fishing conducted in compliance with state fish and game regulations.

Conduct courts have found to constitute illegal interference with fishing:

  • Positioning a vessel between a fisherman’s boat and their target fishing area
  • Releasing bait fish or caught fish from another person’s tackle or live well
  • Deliberately creating water disturbance to prevent successful fishing
  • Using underwater devices or noise makers to scare fish from an area
  • Blocking a boat launch, fishing pier, or public fishing access point

Conduct that has generally not been found to constitute illegal interference:

  • Standing on a public bank near a fisherman and expressing verbal disapproval
  • Filming or photographing a fisherman from a public location
  • Distributing written materials to bystanders near a fishing area
  • Peaceful protest from a lawful vantage point without physical interference

What Counts as Harassing a Fisherman

Harassing a fisherman means taking intentional action that interferes with, disrupts, or obstructs their lawful fishing activity. Most state statutes define this broadly enough to capture a range of conduct from physical obstruction to deliberate environmental disruption.

The conduct does not have to be aggressive or threatening toward the person. It simply has to have the effect of impairing their ability to fish. Courts have applied these statutes to conduct that looks more like annoying than threatening.

Specific conduct that counts as fisherman harassment under most state laws:

  • Physical obstruction: Blocking the fisherman’s position, equipment, or access to water
  • Equipment interference: Touching, moving, or damaging fishing gear, tackle, or bait
  • Catch interference: Releasing, stealing, or damaging the fisherman’s catch
  • Noise or disturbance: Using devices to create sounds or disturbances that scare fish or disrupt fishing
  • Vessel interference: Operating a boat in a manner designed to disrupt a fishing boat’s activity
  • Verbal intimidation: In some states, using threatening language directed at a fisherman to cause them to leave

Conduct that typically does not count as harassment:

  • Fishing in the same general area as another fisherman from a public location
  • Verbally expressing disagreement with fishing from a public space
  • Filming from a public location without physically interfering

Think of the line like this: a journalist standing on a public sidewalk outside a business and shouting criticism is protected speech. That same journalist chaining themselves to the door to prevent business operations is interference. The same principle applies near a fishing location.

Is It Illegal to Scare Fish Away from a Fisherman

Deliberately scaring fish away from a fisherman can be illegal under angler harassment statutes in states that define interference broadly enough to include environmental disruption. Not every state explicitly covers this conduct, but several do.

Florida’s statute, Section 379.105, is among the broadest. It prohibits any conduct that “interferes with the lawful taking of fish,” which courts have interpreted to include deliberate disturbance of the fishing environment, not just direct interference with the fisherman or their equipment.

Texas Parks and Wildlife Code Section 62.0125 similarly covers interference with the lawful taking of wildlife, and Texas courts have applied this to conduct designed to disrupt the fishing environment rather than just the person.

States where fish-scaring conduct has been prosecuted or is clearly covered:

StateStatuteCovers Environmental DisruptionNotes
FloridaFS 379.105Yes“Interference with lawful taking” interpreted broadly
TexasTPWC 62.0125YesCovers disruption of taking process
CaliforniaFish and Game Code 2002YesInterference includes environmental disruption
WashingtonRCW 77.15.600YesCovers conduct that prevents lawful taking
ColoradoCRS 33-6-115PartiallyFocuses more on direct interference
New YorkECL 11-0110PartiallyPrimarily targets direct obstruction

If your state has a narrowly written statute that only covers physical obstruction of the person or equipment, deliberately scaring fish may not constitute a criminal violation under that specific statute, though it could trigger general disorderly conduct or nuisance provisions.

Key Takeaway: Deliberately scaring fish away from a fisherman is illegal in states with broadly written angler harassment statutes like Florida, Texas, California, and Washington, even if no direct physical contact with the fisherman or their equipment occurs.

Penalties for Harassing a Fisherman

Penalties for harassing a fisherman range from fines of $100 to $5,000 depending on the state, with most first offenses classified as misdemeanors. Some states add license revocation, civil liability exposure, and mandatory court appearances on top of criminal fines.

The financial penalty alone understates the full consequence. In states that treat the violation as a criminal misdemeanor, a conviction creates a criminal record. That matters for employment background checks, professional licenses, and other contexts where criminal history is reviewed.

State-by-state penalty overview for fishing harassment violations:

StateStatuteFirst Offense FineCriminal ClassificationLicense Revocation
FloridaFS 379.105Up to $500Second-degree misdemeanorPossible
TexasTPWC 62.0125$200 to $2,000Class B misdemeanorYes, at court discretion
CaliforniaFGC 2002$1,000 to $5,000MisdemeanorYes
New YorkECL 11-0110Up to $250Violation (not misdemeanor)No
WashingtonRCW 77.15.600$500 to $1,000Gross misdemeanorPossible
ColoradoCRS 33-6-115$200 to $1,000Class 2 misdemeanorPossible
OregonORS 166.116Up to $6,250Class A misdemeanorPossible

California stands out for its higher fine range. Oregon’s Class A misdemeanor classification carries one of the higher potential fines in the country for this type of offense. Most states cluster in the $200 to $1,000 range for first offenses.

Is Fishing Harassment a Misdemeanor or Felony

Fishing harassment is classified as a misdemeanor in most states. Felony classification for this offense is rare but exists in a small number of states when aggravating factors are present, such as repeat offenses, physical assault on the fisherman, or significant property damage.

The misdemeanor classification is consistent with how these laws were designed. The legislative intent was to provide a meaningful but proportionate criminal sanction for interference with lawful sporting activity, not to create felony-level exposure for what are often first-time, non-violent offenders.

However, misdemeanor does not mean minor. A Class A or Class B misdemeanor in most states carries up to one year in county jail. Combined with fines, license revocation, and a criminal record, a misdemeanor conviction for fishing harassment can have substantial real-world consequences.

Classification by state for first offense fishing harassment:

StateClassificationMax Jail TimeNotes
FloridaSecond-degree misdemeanorUp to 60 daysPlus up to $500 fine
TexasClass B misdemeanorUp to 180 daysLicense discretionary revocation
CaliforniaMisdemeanorUp to 6 monthsFine up to $5,000
OregonClass A misdemeanorUp to 364 daysFine up to $6,250
WashingtonGross misdemeanorUp to 364 daysSignificant fine range
ColoradoClass 2 misdemeanorUp to 364 daysFine up to $1,000
New YorkViolation (not misdemeanor)Up to 15 daysLowest classification nationally

Repeat violations within a certain period can escalate the classification in some states. A second or third conviction may trigger enhanced misdemeanor treatment or, in rare cases, a low-level felony classification.

Can You Be Arrested for Harassing a Fisherman

Yes, you can be arrested for harassing a fisherman. Law enforcement officers, including game wardens and conservation officers, have the authority to make arrests for violations of angler harassment statutes. Whether arrest happens depends on the severity of the conduct, the jurisdiction, and the officer’s discretion.

Game wardens and state conservation officers are fully empowered law enforcement officials in every state. They carry firearms, issue citations, make arrests, and investigate violations of fish and game laws including angler harassment statutes. Their authority is equivalent to that of a police officer within their jurisdiction.

For a minor first-time interference incident, an officer may issue a citation rather than make a custodial arrest. For more serious conduct involving physical confrontation, property damage, or repeated violations, on-scene arrest is a realistic outcome.

Scenarios that increase the likelihood of arrest:

  • Physical contact with the fisherman or their equipment
  • Repeat violations after prior warnings or citations
  • Conduct occurring in a state park or on public land with ranger or warden presence
  • Organized group interference rather than an individual acting alone
  • Refusal to leave the area after lawful order from an officer

Scenarios less likely to result in immediate arrest:

  • First-time verbal dispute near a fishing area with no physical interference
  • Conduct that is borderline and requires investigation
  • Remote location with delayed law enforcement response

Conservation officer reports of fishing harassment incidents are taken seriously by prosecutors in states with active outdoor recreation cultures like Texas, Florida, and Colorado.

States with Fishing Harassment Laws

Virtually all 50 US states have laws prohibiting interference with lawful hunting or fishing, with most statutes explicitly covering fishing alongside hunting. The laws vary in scope, definition, and penalty severity.

The states with the most expansive and actively enforced fishing harassment statutes are generally those with large recreational fishing industries: Florida, Texas, California, Washington, and Colorado. These states have specific statutory provisions, dedicated enforcement through conservation officers, and documented prosecution histories.

State-by-state overview of fishing harassment law status:

StateHas Specific Angler Harassment LawStatuteActive Enforcement
FloridaYesFS 379.105Yes; FWC actively enforces
TexasYesTPWC 62.0125Yes; TPWD game wardens enforce
CaliforniaYesFish and Game Code 2002Yes; CDFW enforces
WashingtonYesRCW 77.15.600Yes; WDFW enforces
ColoradoYesCRS 33-6-115Yes; CPW enforces
OregonYesORS 166.116Yes; ODFW and OSP enforce
New YorkYesECL 11-0110Yes; DEC officers enforce
GeorgiaYesOCGA 27-3-28Yes; DNR enforces

States without dedicated angler harassment statutes typically address the conduct through general interference with lawful sporting activity laws, disorderly conduct provisions, or trespass statutes. The practical result is similar: interference with lawful fishing is actionable, even if the specific statute name differs.

Hunter and Angler Harassment Laws by State

Hunter and angler harassment laws are typically combined in a single state statute that protects both hunting and fishing activity. The laws treat interference with lawful hunting and interference with lawful fishing as equivalent violations under the same statutory framework.

This combined approach reflects the legislative history of these laws. They were enacted primarily to protect hunters from animal rights activists who physically disrupted hunting. Fishing was added as a protected activity in most states because the same political and legal reasoning applied.

The combined hunter-angler harassment statute structure means that the same conduct that would violate the law against a hunter also violates it against a fisherman. The legal analysis does not differ based on which sporting activity is targeted.

Key differences between state approaches:

State ApproachDescriptionExample States
Combined hunting and fishing statuteSingle law covers both activitiesFlorida, Texas, California, Colorado
Separate hunting and fishing provisionsDifferent code sections for each activitySome Midwestern states
General sporting activity interference lawCovers all lawful recreational activitiesNew England states
Wildlife taking interferenceCovers any lawful taking of wildlife including fishingWashington, Oregon

The practical impact for an angler is the same regardless of which statutory structure the state uses. Deliberate interference with lawful fishing is a criminal offense in virtually every state under one of these frameworks.

Key Takeaway: Hunter and angler harassment laws exist in nearly all 50 states, typically as combined statutes protecting both activities, and enforcement falls on state conservation officers and game wardens who have full arrest authority.

First Amendment and Fishing Harassment Laws

The First Amendment does not protect physical interference with lawful fishing. It does protect purely expressive conduct, such as holding signs, verbally expressing opposition to fishing, or distributing leaflets near a public fishing area.

Courts across the US have consistently upheld angler and hunter harassment statutes against First Amendment challenges. The legal reasoning is that these laws regulate conduct, not speech. Physically blocking a boat launch or releasing a fisherman’s catch is action, not expression. The Constitution protects expression.

The line courts draw is between communication and interference. Communicating a viewpoint about fishing, even forcefully and near fishing activity, remains protected. Taking physical action designed to prevent or disrupt the fishing itself crosses into unprotected conduct.

The leading legal framework comes from cases like Illinois v. DiGuida (1993), where courts recognized that states have a compelling interest in protecting lawful recreational activity, and that harassment statutes are narrowly drawn to address conduct rather than speech.

What the First Amendment protects near a fishing location:

  • Standing peacefully and holding signs opposing fishing
  • Verbally expressing opposition to fishing practices from a public location
  • Filming and photographing fishing activity from a public vantage point
  • Distributing leaflets or literature to bystanders in a public area
  • Organizing a peaceful protest in a public space without physical interference

What the First Amendment does not protect:

  • Blocking physical access to a fishing site
  • Physically touching or moving a fisherman’s equipment
  • Using devices to create disturbances that interfere with fishing
  • Releasing a fisherman’s catch or bait

Can You Protest Near Someone Who Is Fishing

You can legally protest near someone who is fishing as long as your conduct remains expressive rather than physically interfering. Peaceful protest, verbal expression, and sign-holding near a public fishing area are protected by the First Amendment.

The practical rule is about geography and conduct, not viewpoint. Being near a fisherman and expressing opposition to fishing is legal. Positioning yourself between the fisherman and the water, blocking their equipment, or taking any action designed to prevent their fishing crosses the legal line.

Public fishing areas create a more straightforward legal picture. On public land, you generally have the right to be present and to express your views, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions. The key is not disrupting the physical activity itself.

Private fishing areas are different. If the fishing is occurring on private property and you are not authorized to be there, your presence itself may constitute trespass regardless of whether you interfere with the fishing.

Protest conduct and its legal status near fishing locations:

ConductLegal?Why
Holding signs opposing fishing from public landYesProtected First Amendment expression
Verbally opposing fishing from a public locationYesProtected speech; not physical interference
Chanting or singing from a public areaYesProtected expression; not physical disruption
Blocking the fisherman’s casting positionNoPhysical interference with lawful activity
Using an air horn to scare fishNoEnvironmental disruption; harassment statute violation
Releasing the fisherman’s catchNoProperty interference; criminal violation

Does Harassing a Fisherman Apply to Hunters Too

Yes, angler harassment laws protect hunters with the same legal framework, and interference with lawful hunting is equally illegal under the same or parallel state statutes. The legal principles are identical whether the targeted person is fishing or hunting.

The original anti-harassment statutes were enacted specifically to protect hunters, with fishermen added as protected parties in most states. That historical order means hunter harassment cases have a longer prosecution history and more established case law than fishing-specific cases.

For the person committing the harassment, it makes no legal difference whether they’re interfering with fishing or hunting. The conduct analysis is the same, the elements of the offense are the same, and the penalties are typically identical under the combined statute.

One practical difference: hunting typically occurs on private land more frequently than fishing. Hunting interference cases more often involve trespass charges on top of the harassment charge. Fishing, especially recreational fishing in public waters, more commonly involves public access locations where trespass is not an additional issue.

States where the combined statute has been most actively used against hunting harassment:

  • Idaho: Strong enforcement history against anti-hunting activists
  • Montana: Active enforcement through Fish, Wildlife and Parks officers
  • Wyoming: Game and Fish Department actively investigates and prosecutes
  • Pennsylvania: Game Commission officers have broad enforcement authority
  • Wisconsin: DNR wardens enforce aggressively in hunting communities

The same enforcement structure protects fishermen in these states, even if hunting cases dominate the historical prosecution record.

What to Do If Someone Is Harassing You While Fishing

If someone is harassing you while fishing, document the conduct immediately and contact your state’s fish and wildlife agency or local law enforcement. Do not engage physically with the harasser. Remove yourself from danger if necessary and let the legal system handle it.

The most effective response to fishing harassment is a documented, official complaint. Game wardens take these complaints seriously and have specific training and authority to investigate and prosecute angler harassment violations. Your documentation is the foundation of any enforcement action.

Step-by-step response to fishing harassment:

  1. Stay calm and do not escalate. Physical confrontation creates legal risk for you regardless of who started the incident.
  2. Document everything. Use your phone to record video and photographs of the harasser and their conduct. Note the time, date, and specific location.
  3. Note identifying information. Get a description of the harasser, any vehicle information, and the names of any witnesses present.
  4. Call your state wildlife agency. Game wardens are the primary enforcement authority for angler harassment violations. In Florida call FWC, in Texas call TPWD, in California call CDFW.
  5. File a police report. Local law enforcement can assist if game wardens are not immediately available, particularly if the conduct also constitutes general harassment, disorderly conduct, or trespass.
  6. Follow up on your complaint. Request a case number and follow up with the agency to confirm your complaint is being investigated.

Fishermen who document harassment thoroughly and report promptly give enforcement agencies the best possible basis for prosecution. Angler harassment laws exist specifically for this situation. Use them.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the penalty for harassing a fisherman in most states?

The most common penalty for a first offense is a misdemeanor fine ranging from $200 to $1,000, though California allows fines up to $5,000 and Oregon up to $6,250.
Most states classify fishing harassment as a Class A or Class B misdemeanor, which can include jail time of up to 6 to 12 months in addition to fines.
License revocation is an additional penalty in states like Texas, California, and Washington.
A criminal record resulting from the conviction can affect employment and professional licensing beyond the immediate fine.

Can animal rights activists legally protest near someone who is fishing?

Yes, peaceful protest near a fishing location is protected by the First Amendment as long as no physical interference occurs.
Holding signs, verbally expressing opposition to fishing, and distributing leaflets in a public space near a fisherman are all legally protected activities.
The legal line is drawn at physical conduct: blocking access, touching equipment, releasing catch, or using devices to scare fish all violate state angler harassment statutes regardless of the protest context.
Expression is protected; interference is not.

Does angler harassment law apply on private property?

The angler harassment statute applies to lawful fishing wherever it occurs, including private property, but trespass law adds a separate layer of legal complexity on private land.
If you are on private property without permission to protest or interfere with fishing, you face both the harassment charge and a criminal trespass charge simultaneously.
The fisherman harassed on private property has the same legal protection under the harassment statute as one fishing from a public pier or public waterway.
Landowners and their guests fishing on private property are fully protected by these statutes.

Can a game warden arrest someone for harassing a fisherman?

Yes, game wardens and state conservation officers are fully empowered law enforcement officials with arrest authority for violations of fish and game laws including angler harassment statutes.
A game warden can make a custodial arrest, issue a citation, or refer the case to prosecutors depending on the severity of the conduct and their department’s protocols.
Game wardens typically prioritize arrests for cases involving physical confrontation, repeated violations, or significant property damage.
Minor first-time incidents may result in a warning or citation rather than immediate arrest.

Is yelling at a fisherman considered illegal harassment?

Yelling at a fisherman alone, without any physical interference, is generally protected speech under the First Amendment.
Verbal expression, even loud or confrontational, does not typically meet the legal standard for angler harassment unless the state’s statute specifically includes verbal intimidation designed to cause the fisherman to stop fishing.
Some states do include verbal intimidation in their statute definitions, so the answer varies by jurisdiction.
Yelling combined with physical interference or threats of violence crosses into criminal territory regardless of which specific statute applies.

Know Your Rights on the Water

Fishing harassment laws are real, actively enforced, and carry criminal penalties that surprise most people who first encounter them. Whether you’re a fisherman who has been harassed or someone who has ever wondered about the legal limits of protest near fishing activity, the rules are clearer than you might expect.

Bookmark this article and share it with your fishing community or anyone who spends time near active fishing areas. The laws in this area are specific, the penalties are meaningful, and the enforcement agencies take violations seriously.

Share