Is It Illegal to Feed the Homeless in the US? 2026

Legally Explained
On: May 9, 2026 |
233 Views

Yes, feeding homeless people is illegal in dozens of US cities and in some states under specific conditions. There is no federal law that bans it, but local ordinances and state statutes have made outdoor food sharing a legal minefield in many parts of the country.

More than 70 US cities had laws restricting public food sharing as of the mid-2020s, and that number has grown. The surprising part is how these laws are framed: not as cruelty, but as health and safety regulations.

The US Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling in Grants Pass v. Johnson changed the constitutional landscape around homeless-related laws. That decision cleared the path for more cities to enforce restrictions on outdoor activities involving homeless populations.

This guide covers which states and cities prohibit it, what the penalties are, whether you need a permit, what constitutional protections exist, and what the Good Samaritan Food Donation Act actually does and does not cover.

Is It Illegal to Feed the Homeless

Feeding homeless people is illegal in some US cities and states under specific circumstances, but it is not universally banned across the country. The legality depends on where you are, whether you have a permit, and whether you are operating in a restricted public space.

No federal law prohibits feeding homeless individuals. The restrictions come from local ordinances and, in at least one state (Florida), from a statewide law. These laws are typically framed around food safety, public health, or land use, rather than explicitly targeting charitable intent.

The legal situation has become more complex since the Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson. That ruling held that cities can enforce restrictions on homeless encampments and outdoor activities without violating the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. While the case focused on camping, it signaled that courts will generally allow municipalities broad authority to regulate outdoor activities involving homeless populations.

  • No federal law bans feeding homeless people
  • Local city ordinances are the primary restriction mechanism
  • Florida is the most prominent state with a statewide restriction law
  • Laws are typically enforced through food safety or public space regulations
  • Enforcement varies dramatically by city and by political climate

Is It Illegal to Feed the Homeless in Florida

Feeding homeless people in public without government approval is illegal under Florida law. Florida Statutes Section 509.235, enacted in 2024, requires any group providing food to the public outdoors, including homeless individuals, to comply with local government regulations and obtain any required permits.

Florida’s law effectively preempts local ordinances on food sharing, meaning cities cannot pass rules that are more lenient than the state standard. The law was passed amid significant public controversy, with Orlando being one of the flashpoints that drew national attention. Orlando’s Chapter 18A ordinance had already restricted public food sharing before the statewide law passed.

Under Florida’s framework, organizations feeding homeless people in public spaces must obtain a permit from the local government and comply with food safety standards equivalent to those required of food service establishments. Violations can result in civil fines.

The practical impact has been significant. Faith-based groups, volunteer organizations, and individual volunteers have faced citations and fines in Florida cities including Orlando, Fort Lauderdale, and Tampa for distributing food in parks or on public sidewalks without the required permits.

Florida CityOrdinancePermit RequiredFine for Violation
OrlandoChapter 18AYesUp to $500 per incident
Fort LauderdaleMunicipal CodeYesUp to $500 per incident
TampaCity ordinanceYesSpecific penalties not publicly confirmed
JacksonvilleLocal food codeYesSpecific penalties not publicly confirmed

Key Takeaway: Florida is the most high-profile state where feeding homeless people without a permit is explicitly illegal under both state law and local ordinances. Fines can reach $500 per incident, and the state law sets a statewide compliance standard.

Cities Where It Is Illegal to Feed the Homeless

More than 70 US cities have passed ordinances restricting or banning outdoor food sharing with homeless people, and the number continues to grow. These cities are spread across the country and are not concentrated in any single political region.

Cities with well-documented food sharing restrictions include Orlando, Fort Lauderdale, Houston, Dallas, Las Vegas, Philadelphia, Los Angeles (in certain parks), Raleigh, and Phoenix. The restrictions vary in scope. Some ban feeding in specific parks or public spaces. Others require permits citywide for any outdoor food distribution to the public.

feeding homeless people

Houston, Texas, passed one of the earliest and most debated food sharing ordinances in 2012. The Houston ordinance under Chapter 20 of the Houston Code of Ordinances requires that organizations feeding 10 or more people in public spaces obtain a permit from the city’s health department. Operating without that permit can result in fines.

Raleigh, North Carolina, enforced a food sharing restriction that generated significant controversy when it was used against volunteers from Love Wins Ministries in 2013. That case drew national media attention and highlighted how broadly these ordinances can be applied.

CityStateRestriction TypePermit Required?
OrlandoFloridaPark-based ban, statewide lawYes
HoustonTexasHealth permit for 10+ peopleYes
Fort LauderdaleFloridaPublic space permitYes
Las VegasNevadaCertain park zonesYes
DallasTexasHealth department permitYes
RaleighNorth CarolinaPublic space restrictionSpecific details vary
PhoenixArizonaPark-specific restrictionsYes
PhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaLimited park zonesSpecific details vary

Is It Illegal to Feed Homeless People in Public

Feeding homeless people in public is illegal without a permit in dozens of US cities. The specific prohibition usually applies to distributing food to any member of the public in designated public spaces, not exclusively to homeless individuals. However, the practical enforcement target is overwhelmingly outdoor charitable food distribution.

The legal mechanism cities use is important to understand. Most food sharing bans are not written to say “you cannot give food to homeless people.” Instead, they are framed as health and safety regulations: you cannot distribute food to the public in a park, on a sidewalk, or in a public right-of-way without a permit and without meeting food safety standards.

This framing has two effects. First, it provides legal justification by tying the restriction to public health rather than targeting a protected class. Second, it means that even well-organized nonprofits with paid staff can face violations if they have not obtained the correct permits and followed the applicable food safety codes.

Think of it like street vending. A food truck operator cannot just park anywhere and sell food. They need permits, health inspections, and designated locations. Food sharing ordinances apply similar logic to charitable food distribution, though critics argue the analogy breaks down because charitable giving is fundamentally different from commercial food service.

  • Most restrictions apply to any public food distribution, not homeless-specific giving
  • Health and safety framing is the dominant legal mechanism
  • Permit requirements often include food handler certifications and health department approval
  • Location restrictions are common, particularly in parks and near tourist areas
  • Enforcement tends to be complaint-driven or target organized, visible distributions

States Where It Is Illegal to Feed the Homeless

Florida is the clearest example of a state where feeding homeless people in public without a permit is prohibited under state law. Most other states leave the regulation to individual cities and municipalities, meaning the answer varies by location within those states.

Beyond Florida, several states have seen significant legislative activity on this issue. Texas has not passed a statewide food sharing restriction, but multiple Texas cities including Houston and Dallas enforce permit-based restrictions. California has a mixed picture: some cities restrict outdoor feeding while the state has generally been resistant to broad statewide criminalization.

North Carolina, Georgia, and Arizona have seen multiple city-level food sharing restrictions, but none have passed comprehensive statewide laws equivalent to Florida’s. Several state legislatures have considered preemption laws, which would either mandate that cities allow charitable food sharing or, in the other direction, standardize restrictions statewide.

StateStatewide Law?Primary MechanismStatus as of 2026
FloridaYes (Statutes 509.235)Permit requirementActive and enforced
TexasNoCity-level ordinancesVaries by city
CaliforniaNoCity-level ordinancesVaries by city
North CarolinaNoCity-level ordinancesMultiple city restrictions
ArizonaNoCity-level ordinancesPhoenix and Tucson restrictions
GeorgiaNoCity-level ordinancesAtlanta restrictions noted
NevadaNoCity-level ordinancesLas Vegas restrictions active

Why Is It Illegal to Feed the Homeless

Food sharing bans are justified by cities and states on public health, public safety, and urban management grounds. The official rationale is rarely stated as opposition to charity. It is framed as concern about food safety, sanitation, attracting large gatherings, and maintaining public spaces.

Cities argue that unregulated outdoor food distribution can pose health risks because food prepared and distributed without commercial kitchen oversight or health department inspection may be improperly stored or prepared. They argue that large feeding events in parks create sanitation problems, waste, and crowds that affect other park users.

A secondary argument cities make is that public feeding concentrates homeless populations in specific areas, creating what they describe as public order concerns. Critics of these ordinances, including the ACLU and the National Homelessness Law Center, argue that this reasoning is exactly the problem: cities are using health and safety rationale to push homeless individuals out of sight rather than to address their underlying needs.

Courts have generally allowed cities to enforce these ordinances as long as they are facially neutral (applying to all public food distribution, not just homeless-targeted feeding) and provide some alternative pathway for compliance, such as a permit.

  • Official justification: public health, food safety, sanitation, crowd management
  • Secondary justification: public order and park management
  • Critic argument: laws are designed to criminalize homelessness, not protect health
  • Legal standard: facially neutral application with a compliance pathway generally survives constitutional challenge
  • Post-Grants Pass v. Johnson: courts are more permissive of these restrictions

What Is the Penalty for Feeding the Homeless Illegally

Penalties for feeding homeless people without required permits range from civil fines of $50 to $500 per violation in most cities, with some jurisdictions allowing repeat violations to escalate to misdemeanor criminal charges. The exact penalty depends on the specific ordinance or statute involved.

In Florida cities operating under the state’s 2024 food sharing law, civil fines for unauthorized public food distribution can reach $500 per incident. Orlando’s Chapter 18A ordinance historically imposed fines in this range. Fort Lauderdale has imposed similar civil penalties.

Houston’s ordinance under Chapter 20 of the city code can result in fines for operating without a permit. The penalty schedule for Houston food safety violations allows fines ranging from $200 to $2,000 depending on the nature and severity of the violation.

In cities where the restriction is enforced through criminal misdemeanor provisions, an arrest for violation of a food sharing ordinance can result in a misdemeanor charge carrying potential fines of up to $1,000 and, in theory, jail time of up to 30 days, though jail sentences for these offenses are extremely rare in practice.

City / StatePenalty TypeFine RangeCriminal Charge Possible?
Florida (state law)CivilUp to $500 per incidentSpecific penalties not publicly confirmed
Orlando, FLCivilUp to $500 per incidentNo (civil ordinance)
Houston, TXCivil / administrative$200 to $2,000Possible for repeat violations
Las Vegas, NVCivilSpecific penalties not publicly confirmedVaries
Fort Lauderdale, FLCivilUp to $500No (civil ordinance)
General municipal rangeCivil or criminal$50 to $1,000Misdemeanor possible in some jurisdictions

Key Takeaway: The most common penalty for feeding homeless people without a permit is a civil fine in the range of $50 to $500. Criminal charges are possible in some jurisdictions for repeat violations, but jail time for first offenses is essentially unheard of.

Is It Illegal to Feed the Homeless Without a Permit

Yes, in cities and states with food sharing restrictions, feeding homeless people in public without the required permit is illegal. The permit requirement is the central enforcement mechanism in most food sharing ordinances.

Permit requirements vary significantly. Some cities require a basic registration with the parks department. Others require a food handler’s permit from the health department, documentation of proper food preparation facilities, proof of liability insurance, and advance notice of the time and location of the feeding event.

In Houston, organizations feeding 10 or more people in a public space must obtain a permit from the city health department. The application process involves a fee and an inspection component. Organizations that skip the permit process risk citation even if their food preparation standards are impeccable.

Faith-based organizations have challenged these permit requirements on religious freedom grounds, arguing that the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) and the First Amendment’s free exercise clause protect charitable food distribution as a religious act. Courts have had mixed results with these challenges. Some have found that permit requirements with reasonable compliance pathways do not substantially burden religious exercise. Others have sided with religious organizations.

  • Permit applications are typically filed with city health departments or parks departments
  • Requirements may include food handler certifications, kitchen inspection, and insurance
  • Houston requires permits for groups feeding 10 or more people
  • Florida’s state law requires compliance with local government regulations
  • Religious freedom challenges have had mixed success in court
  • Individual one-on-one food sharing (one person giving another person food) is rarely targeted

Can You Get Arrested for Feeding Homeless People

Yes, you can get arrested for feeding homeless people in cities where the food sharing ordinance carries criminal enforcement provisions. In practice, arrests are rare and typically follow repeated documented violations after prior warnings and citations.

Most initial enforcement actions involve a verbal warning or a civil citation, not an arrest. Law enforcement officers in cities with active food sharing ordinances are generally instructed to use warnings first, escalating to civil citations for repeat violations, and reserving criminal enforcement for persistent non-compliance.

Arrests have occurred in documented cases. In Fort Lauderdale, Florida, several volunteers and advocates were arrested in 2014 for repeatedly feeding homeless people in a park after being warned and cited multiple times. Those arrests generated significant national news coverage and led to a legal challenge to the Fort Lauderdale ordinance.

The likelihood of arrest depends on the specific city, the political climate, the visibility of the feeding activity, and whether the organizer has been previously cited. A lone individual quietly giving food to one homeless person in a park is virtually never arrested. An organized group repeatedly defying a cease-and-desist order after multiple citations faces genuine arrest risk.

  • Arrest is rare for first-time, low-profile violations
  • Repeat violations after citations carry significantly higher arrest risk
  • Fort Lauderdale 2014 arrests are the most documented example of this enforcement
  • Criminal misdemeanor charges are possible in cities with criminal-penalty ordinances
  • High-profile organized defiance of court orders escalates arrest probability
  • Individual quiet food sharing is almost never criminally enforced

Is Feeding the Homeless Illegal in Texas

Feeding homeless people is not illegal under Texas state law, but it is regulated in multiple Texas cities through local permit ordinances. Texas has not passed a statewide food sharing restriction equivalent to Florida’s 2024 law.

Houston is the most prominent Texas city with active food sharing regulations. Houston’s Code of Ordinances Chapter 20 requires organizations that feed 10 or more people in a public outdoor space to obtain a permit from the Houston Health Department. The permit process involves completing an application, meeting food safety standards, and obtaining approval before conducting the feeding event.

Dallas has similar permit requirements for outdoor food distribution events. Organizations operating without required permits in Dallas can face health code violations administered through Dallas Code Compliance Services.

Texas cities enforce these ordinances primarily through health department inspection and citation processes. The Texas Local Government Code generally allows cities broad authority to regulate public health activities, which is the legal foundation for these municipal food sharing restrictions.

  • No statewide Texas law prohibiting homeless feeding
  • Houston requires health department permits for groups feeding 10+ people in public
  • Dallas enforces permit requirements through Code Compliance Services
  • Texas cities rely on health and safety authority under the Texas Local Government Code
  • San Antonio and Austin have fewer formal restrictions, though park rules apply
  • Violations are typically civil health code citations, not criminal charges

Is Feeding the Homeless Illegal in California

Feeding homeless people is not illegal under California state law, and California has been one of the more resistant states to adopting statewide food sharing restrictions. However, individual California cities and counties do have local ordinances that restrict outdoor food distribution in certain locations.

Los Angeles has park-specific rules that limit organized food distribution events in city parks. These rules require coordination with the city’s Department of Recreation and Parks for large-scale feeding events. San Diego has enforced restrictions on unauthorized feeding events in certain public areas.

California’s overall legal posture has been shaped in part by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which has historically been more protective of homeless individuals’ rights than other circuit courts. The 9th Circuit’s 2019 decision in Martin v. City of Boise held that cities could not enforce anti-camping laws against homeless people when there was no adequate shelter alternative. That ruling influenced how California cities approached all homeless-related enforcement.

The US Supreme Court’s June 2024 decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson overturned the Martin ruling’s practical effect and allowed cities to enforce outdoor restrictions more broadly. This has opened the door for stricter enforcement of food sharing and outdoor gathering rules in California cities, and several California municipalities have moved to update their ordinances since that ruling.

  • No statewide California law banning homeless feeding
  • Los Angeles restricts large-scale park feeding events through park rules
  • San Diego has enforced localized feeding restrictions
  • Grants Pass v. Johnson (2024) has shifted the enforcement landscape in California
  • Religious organizations and nonprofits often operate under specific permit agreements with cities
  • Individual food sharing is not targeted for enforcement in California

Is Feeding the Homeless Illegal in New York

Feeding homeless people is not illegal under New York state law or New York City ordinances. New York City has generally maintained a permissive approach to charitable food distribution, with no comprehensive ban on outdoor food sharing.

New York City’s approach has historically been to manage charitable food distribution through coordination with city agencies rather than through prohibition. Organizations conducting large-scale outdoor food distribution in New York City parks must obtain a permit from the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation for events over a certain size. This is not a prohibition; it is a permitting and coordination requirement.

New York State’s general food safety laws apply to organized food distribution, meaning that groups operating soup kitchens or regular feeding programs must comply with applicable health codes. These requirements are focused on food safety rather than on restricting charitable activity.

The political environment in New York City has consistently opposed criminalization of homeless feeding. City Council members and state legislators have actively resisted ordinances that would restrict charitable food sharing, and no significant food sharing ban has passed in the city.

  • No New York City ordinance banning outdoor homeless feeding
  • Large park events require standard NYC Parks Department permits
  • Food safety compliance is required for organized feeding programs
  • Political environment in NYC strongly opposes food sharing bans
  • New York State does not restrict charitable food distribution
  • Individual food sharing faces no legal restriction in New York

Key Takeaway: Texas, California, and New York do not have statewide bans on feeding homeless people, but city-level permit requirements exist in several municipalities. The strictest enforcement landscape in the country is Florida, where a 2024 state law mandates compliance with local permit requirements.

Is It Illegal to Feed the Homeless in Las Vegas

Feeding homeless people in Las Vegas is restricted in certain areas under Las Vegas Municipal Code provisions governing public parks and public spaces. Las Vegas has enforced food sharing restrictions, particularly in areas near tourist corridors and city parks.

Las Vegas Municipal Code Section 13.36.010 governs activities in city parks and includes provisions that have been applied to organized food distribution events. Organizations feeding homeless people in Las Vegas parks have been cited for operating without permits.

Las Vegas’s enforcement has been particularly visible because of the city’s strong interest in managing the appearance of its downtown and tourist areas. The city has also been the subject of documentary coverage and national media attention for its enforcement of anti-homeless measures, which has included cracking down on outdoor feeding events.

The Clark County, Nevada, Sheriff’s department and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police have both been involved in enforcement actions related to outdoor feeding events. Some of these actions have targeted well-known advocacy groups.

  • Las Vegas Municipal Code 13.36.010 applies to park activities including feeding events
  • Permit requirements exist for organized feeding events in city parks
  • Tourist area enforcement is a particular priority for Las Vegas authorities
  • Individual quiet food sharing is generally not targeted
  • Clark County and city authorities both have enforcement roles
  • Fines and citations have been issued to organized groups operating without permits

Food Sharing Ban Laws

Food sharing ban laws is the umbrella term for the category of municipal ordinances and state statutes that restrict or prohibit distributing food to the public, including homeless individuals, in public spaces without government authorization. These laws have proliferated significantly since 2010.

The National Homelessness Law Center has tracked these ordinances and documented more than 70 cities with food sharing restrictions as of the early 2020s. That number continued to grow through 2025, particularly following the Supreme Court’s 2024 Grants Pass decision, which provided cities with additional constitutional cover for outdoor restriction ordinances.

Food sharing bans operate through several distinct legal mechanisms. Some are park ordinances prohibiting specific activities. Others are health code regulations requiring permits for food distribution. Some are explicitly written as food sharing restrictions. Others achieve the same result through general public space management codes.

The trend in food sharing ban legislation since 2023 has been toward permit-based systems rather than outright bans. Courts have been more willing to uphold ordinances that provide a compliance pathway through permitting than those that simply prohibit the activity entirely.

  • Over 70 US cities had food sharing restrictions by the early 2020s
  • The number grew post-Grants Pass v. Johnson (2024)
  • Legal mechanisms include park rules, health codes, and specific food sharing ordinances
  • Permit-based systems are the legally dominant current model
  • Outright bans without compliance pathways face stronger constitutional challenges
  • Enforcement is primarily complaint-driven and targets organized, visible distributions

Constitutional Rights and Feeding the Homeless

The constitutional debate over food sharing bans centers on the First Amendment’s free speech and free exercise clauses, the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, and equal protection arguments. Courts have been divided on how these protections apply.

First Amendment challenges have argued that charitable food sharing is expressive conduct protected by free speech or that it is a religious act protected by the free exercise clause. Some courts have accepted these arguments. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2018 in Abbott v. City of Fort Lauderdale that Fort Lauderdale’s food sharing ordinance violated the First Amendment’s free speech protections as applied to a religious organization’s food sharing activities.

The Eighth Amendment argument, that criminalizing food sharing is cruel and unusual punishment, gained some traction after the 9th Circuit’s Martin v. City of Boise ruling. However, the Supreme Court’s 2024 Grants Pass v. Johnson decision significantly narrowed those protections.

Equal protection arguments contend that food sharing bans, while facially neutral, are specifically designed and enforced to target homeless individuals. These arguments have had limited success in court.

  • First Amendment free speech challenges have succeeded in some circuit courts
  • First Amendment free exercise (religious freedom) challenges have had mixed results
  • RLUIPA protections for religious organizations provide some additional protection
  • 8th Amendment argument narrowed by Grants Pass v. Johnson (Supreme Court, 2024)
  • Abbott v. City of Fort Lauderdale (11th Circuit, 2018) overturned a food sharing ban
  • Equal protection challenges have been largely unsuccessful in courts

Good Samaritan Food Donation Act and Homeless Feeding

The Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act (42 U.S.C. 1791) does not protect street-level direct feeding of homeless individuals from local food sharing ordinances. This is one of the most widely misunderstood points in this entire legal area.

The Good Samaritan Food Donation Act protects food donors, food banks, and gleaning organizations from civil and criminal liability when donated food causes illness. Its purpose is to encourage food donation to nonprofit organizations by eliminating the legal risk of being sued if donated food makes someone sick. It does not create a right to distribute food in public, and it does not preempt local permit ordinances.

The distinction is crucial. A restaurant donating surplus food to a food bank is protected from liability under the Good Samaritan Act if that donated food later causes illness. A volunteer handing out sandwiches in a city park without a permit is not protected from an ordinance violation citation by the Good Samaritan Act.

Food sharing advocates frequently cite the Good Samaritan Act as a protection it simply does not provide. Understanding this distinction prevents volunteers and organizations from relying on a legal protection that does not apply to their specific activity.

  • The Good Samaritan Food Donation Act covers liability protection for food donations to nonprofits
  • It does not preempt local food sharing ordinances or permit requirements
  • It protects against civil and criminal liability for illness caused by donated food
  • It does not create a right to distribute food in public spaces
  • Volunteers often mistakenly believe this Act protects their public feeding activities
  • Actual protection for public feeding comes from permit compliance, not the Good Samaritan Act

Frequently Asked Questions

Is feeding homeless people illegal at the federal level in the United States?

No, there is no federal law that makes feeding homeless people illegal.
All restrictions on feeding homeless people come from local city ordinances or state laws.
The federal government has not passed any law targeting charitable food sharing.

What is the fine for feeding homeless people without a permit?

Fines for feeding homeless people without a permit typically range from $50 to $500 per incident for civil violations.
Florida cities including Orlando and Fort Lauderdale have imposed fines up to $500 per incident under local ordinances.
Houston’s health code violations can range from $200 to $2,000 for more serious permit violations.

Did the Supreme Court rule on laws that criminalize feeding the homeless?

The Supreme Court ruled on a related issue in Grants Pass v. Johnson in June 2024.
That decision held that cities can enforce outdoor restriction ordinances against homeless individuals without violating the Eighth Amendment.
The ruling did not specifically address food sharing ordinances, but it gave cities broader constitutional authority to enforce outdoor restrictions.

Can a church or religious group be fined for feeding homeless people in public?

Yes, churches and religious groups can be fined for feeding homeless people in public without the required permits.
The 11th Circuit ruled in 2018 that Fort Lauderdale’s ordinance violated First Amendment protections as applied to a religious organization’s food sharing, but that decision applies only in the 11th Circuit.
Religious freedom challenges have had mixed results, and permit requirements with compliance pathways generally survive court challenges even when applied to faith-based organizations.

What states have passed laws making it illegal to feed the homeless?

Florida is the most prominent state with a statewide law restricting public food sharing, enacted in 2024 under Florida Statutes Section 509.235.
Most other states leave this issue to individual cities and municipalities.
Texas, California, New York, Arizona, and other states have not passed statewide food sharing restrictions, though many cities in those states have local permit ordinances.

Laws in This Area Change Frequently. Stay Informed.

The legal picture around feeding homeless people is one of the most actively shifting areas of local and state law in the country. Court decisions, new ordinances, and political changes all affect what is and is not permitted in any given city or state.

Bookmark this page and check back as new legislation and court rulings update these rules throughout 2026. Knowing the specific rules in your city before you organize a feeding event is the most effective way to protect yourself and keep helping others.

Share