Burning a CD is not automatically illegal, but the legality flips fast depending on what you’re copying, why you’re doing it, and what you plan to do with the disc. The question of whether it is illegal to burn cds has a real answer rooted in federal copyright law, and most people have it at least partially wrong.
The most common misconception: that burning a CD you already paid for is always fine. The law is more specific than that.
This article covers every scenario: personal use, backup copies, burning for friends, selling burned discs, streaming service rules, and what actual penalties look like. You’ll know exactly where the line is by the end.
Is It Illegal to Burn CDs
Burning a CD is illegal when it involves copying copyrighted material without authorization and in a way that violates federal copyright law under Title 17 of the United States Code.
That sentence sounds dense, so here’s the practical version: copying a music CD you own for personal listening is generally tolerated and rarely prosecuted. Copying someone else’s CD, burning discs to distribute, or recording from a streaming service crosses into clearly illegal territory.
The law does not have a simple “burning CDs is always fine” or “burning CDs is always illegal” statement. Context is everything. The controlling factors are:
- Whether you own the original
- Whether you bypass any digital rights management (DRM) protection
- Whether you distribute copies or keep them private
- Whether you profit from the copies
Federal copyright law gives music rights holders exclusive control over reproduction and distribution. Burning a CD that reproduces those works without permission is the act that creates legal exposure.
Quick Facts:
- Governing federal law: Title 17, United States Code
- Primary enforcement agency: Department of Justice (criminal cases) and civil plaintiffs (labels, artists)
- Legal standard: Reproduction and distribution rights belong to the copyright holder
- Most common violation: Burning multiple copies for distribution or sale
Is It Legal to Burn CDs
Burning a CD is legal in specific, limited circumstances, primarily when you own the original recording, do not bypass copy protection, and keep the copy strictly for personal use.
That’s a narrower window than most people assume. Courts and the music industry have never formally established an unlimited “personal use” right for CD burning. What exists instead is a combination of fair use principles, the Audio Home Recording Act, and the practical reality that private, non-commercial copying is rarely pursued legally.
The situations where burning is considered legally safe:
- Copying a CD you purchased physically to make a personal backup
- Creating a mix CD from tracks you own for your own use
- Burning public domain audio content, which has no copyright restrictions
- Burning original content you personally created
The situations that are legally risky, regardless of intent:
- Copying a CD borrowed from a library or friend
- Recording audio from a streaming service and burning it
- Burning copies to give away or sell, even “for free”
Think of it like making a photocopy of a book page you own for personal notes. That’s generally tolerated. Photocopying the whole book to hand out copies? That’s where the law steps in clearly.
Key Takeaway: Burning CDs occupies a legal gray zone for personal use, but the moment copies leave your hands or you bypass DRM protections, the legal exposure becomes very real.
Is It Illegal to Burn CDs for Personal Use
Burning a CD strictly for your own personal use is not explicitly illegal under federal law, but it is also not explicitly protected by any statute in all situations.
This is the core tension that confuses people. The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 (AHRA) was supposed to address this, but its protections have significant limits (covered in depth in its own section below). Fair use under 17 U.S.C. Section 107 provides a potential defense, but fair use is a defense you raise in court, not a right you can count on automatically.

For practical purposes, private non-commercial copying of music CDs you already own has not been aggressively prosecuted by the music industry or the Department of Justice. The RIAA’s enforcement actions have historically targeted uploaders and distributors, not people making personal copies.
That said, “not actively prosecuted” is not the same as “legal.” The distinction matters if you’re ever in a dispute.
Personal Use CD Burning: Where It Stands Legally
| Scenario | Legal Status | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|
| Copy your own CD for personal listening | Legally gray, tolerated | Low |
| Copy a borrowed CD for personal use | Likely infringing | Moderate |
| Copy a CD with DRM bypassed | Likely illegal under DMCA | High |
| Burn public domain audio | Legal | None |
| Copy for backup, no distribution | Legally gray, tolerated | Low |
Burning CDs Copyright Law
Copyright law governing CD burning in the United States lives primarily in Title 17 of the United States Code, which grants copyright holders exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute their works.
When you burn a CD, you are reproducing a copyrighted work. That reproduction right belongs to the artist, label, or rights holder, not to you as a consumer. Your purchase of a CD gives you ownership of the physical disc, not the underlying copyright in the music.
Three specific legal frameworks control this area:
17 U.S.C. Section 106 gives copyright holders the exclusive right to reproduce their works. Burning a CD without authorization potentially violates this right.
17 U.S.C. Section 107 establishes the fair use defense. Courts weigh four factors: the purpose of the use (commercial or non-commercial), the nature of the work, the amount copied, and the effect on the market for the original work. Private non-commercial copying scores better on these factors than commercial or distributional copying.
The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 created a specific legal space for home recording, but courts have interpreted its scope narrowly, especially for computers and CD-R drives.
- Reproduction rights: Section 106
- Fair use defense: Section 107
- Civil penalties: Section 504
- Criminal penalties: Section 506
- Home recording: AHRA (17 U.S.C. Chapter 10)
Is It Legal to Copy a CD You Own
Copying a CD you purchased is not explicitly authorized by law, but courts have generally treated private format-shifting as a low-risk activity that falls within fair use principles.
The concept at play here is “format shifting,” which means converting music you own in one format (physical CD) to another format (burned copy or digital file) for your own convenience. Courts have acknowledged format shifting in various contexts, including the famous 1998 decision in RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia, where the Ninth Circuit recognized non-commercial space-shifting of music as a legitimate use.
That ruling involved MP3 players, not CD burners specifically. But the underlying principle, that copying for personal convenience without market harm is treated more favorably under fair use analysis, applies broadly.
What you cannot do, even with a CD you own:
- Bypass any copy protection software on the disc (DMCA violation)
- Make copies to give or sell to others
- Upload the content to a sharing platform
- Use the copies commercially
Quick Facts:
- Format shifting: Generally tolerated for personal use
- DRM bypassing: Illegal under DMCA regardless of ownership
- Distribution of copies: Illegal regardless of whether you own the original
- Key case: RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia Systems, 180 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 1998)
Key Takeaway: Owning a CD gives you legal ownership of the disc, not the music itself. Copying it strictly for personal use sits in a legally gray but low-risk zone, as long as you don’t bypass copy protection or share the copies.
Can You Burn a CD for a Friend Legally
Burning a CD for a friend is generally illegal under federal copyright law, even if you own the original and even if you’re not charging money for it.
This surprises a lot of people. The logic feels intuitive: you bought the album, you love it, you want your friend to hear it. But copyright law does not distinguish between giving away infringing copies for free and selling them for profit. Both involve distributing a reproduction of a copyrighted work without authorization.
The reproduction you make and the act of giving it away both potentially infringe on the copyright holder’s exclusive rights under 17 U.S.C. Section 106.
The practical reality: the music industry has never systematically pursued individuals who burned one copy for a friend. Enforcement has focused on large-scale distributors, file-sharing networks, and commercial bootleggers. But the legal exposure exists.
Burning for a Friend: The Legal Breakdown
| Factor | Personal Copy | Copy for Friend |
|---|---|---|
| You own the original | Yes | Yes |
| Distribution occurs | No | Yes |
| Commercial gain | No | No |
| Legal status | Gray zone | Likely infringing |
| Prosecution risk | Very low | Very low but higher |
| Civil suit risk | Very low | Low to moderate |
Fair Use and Burning CDs
Fair use is a legal defense under 17 U.S.C. Section 107 that can potentially protect certain CD burning activities, but it is not a blanket permission slip for copying music.
Fair use is evaluated on a case-by-case basis using four statutory factors. Courts weigh all four together, not individually. No single factor automatically wins the case.
The four fair use factors applied to CD burning:
Factor 1: Purpose and character of the use. Non-commercial, personal use weighs in your favor. Commercial use or distribution weighs against you.
Factor 2: Nature of the copyrighted work. Music is highly creative, which gives copyright holders stronger protection. This factor typically weighs against the person burning.
Factor 3: Amount of the work copied. Burning a full album means copying 100% of the work. This weighs against fair use.
Factor 4: Effect on the market for the original. If your copy substitutes for a purchase, it harms the market. Private backup copies of CDs you own score better here than copies made for others.
Burning a full album for yourself scores better on Factors 1 and 4. Burning for friends or distribution fails on all four factors.
| Fair Use Factor | Personal Backup Copy | Copy for Friend | Sold Copy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose (non-commercial) | Favorable | Neutral | Unfavorable |
| Nature of work | Unfavorable | Unfavorable | Unfavorable |
| Amount copied | Unfavorable | Unfavorable | Unfavorable |
| Market effect | Favorable | Unfavorable | Unfavorable |
| Overall assessment | Gray zone | Likely infringing | Clearly infringing |
Audio Home Recording Act CD Burning
The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 (AHRA) was designed to protect home music recording, but it does not protect most modern CD burning because it excludes computers and general-purpose CD-R drives.
This is the legal fact that surprises almost everyone. When Congress passed the AHRA in 1992, it created a system where manufacturers of digital audio recording devices pay royalties into a fund and consumers are protected from copyright infringement claims for non-commercial home recording. Sounds like exactly what you need when burning a CD, right?
The catch: courts have ruled that computers are not “digital audio recording devices” under the AHRA. The Ninth Circuit confirmed this in RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia Systems (1998), finding that the Rio MP3 player did not qualify as a digital audio recording device because it reproduced from a computer’s hard drive, not directly from a protected digital audio recording.
What the AHRA does and does not cover:
- Covered: Dedicated digital audio tape (DAT) recorders, certain standalone audio CD recorders sold as audio devices
- Not covered: Computers with CD-R drives burning music
- Not covered: Software-based burning programs
- Not covered: External CD burners connected to computers
- Result: The AHRA’s consumer protection does not apply to the vast majority of modern CD burning
Key Takeaway: The Audio Home Recording Act sounds like it protects everyday CD burning, but courts have ruled it does not apply to computer-based burning, which is how virtually everyone burns CDs today.
DMCA and Burning CDs
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA) adds a separate layer of legal restriction on CD burning, specifically targeting the bypassing of any copy protection technology on a disc.
Under 17 U.S.C. Section 1201, the DMCA makes it illegal to circumvent a technological protection measure that controls access to a copyrighted work. Many commercial CDs have embedded copy protection. If you use software to bypass that protection in order to rip or burn the content, you have committed a DMCA violation regardless of whether you own the disc.
This is a critical distinction from fair use analysis. Fair use asks whether the copying itself is permissible. The DMCA’s anti-circumvention provision makes the act of bypassing protection illegal, separate from any question of what you do with the content afterward.
DMCA and CD Burning: Key Rules
| Action | DMCA Status |
|---|---|
| Burning a non-DRM CD you own | Not a DMCA issue |
| Bypassing copy protection to rip a CD | Illegal under Section 1201 |
| Using software that breaks DRM to burn | Likely illegal |
| Burning public domain content | No DMCA issue |
| Recording streaming audio and burning | Potential Section 1201 violation |
Civil penalties for DMCA violations start at $200 for innocent violations and reach $2,500 per act for knowing violations. Criminal penalties for willful violations can reach up to $500,000 and 5 years imprisonment for a first offense.
Is It Illegal to Burn CDs from Spotify or Streaming
Burning CDs from Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal, or any other streaming service is illegal under both copyright law and those platforms’ terms of service.
Streaming services license music to you for listening, not for reproduction. Your subscription gives you access, not ownership. Recording that streamed audio and burning it to a CD creates an unauthorized reproduction of a copyrighted work.
The DMCA anti-circumvention problem applies directly here. Streaming services use DRM and encryption to protect their content. Any software that captures that audio stream and converts it into a burnable file is likely circumventing a technological protection measure under 17 U.S.C. Section 1201.
Spotify’s Terms of Service explicitly state that users may not “copy, reproduce, download, or otherwise extract” the audio content from the platform. Violating those terms can result in account termination in addition to copyright exposure.
Streaming Platform Rules on CD Burning:
| Platform | Terms Allow Burning | DRM Protected | Legal to Burn |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spotify | No | Yes | No |
| Apple Music | No | Yes | No |
| Tidal | No | Yes | No |
| Amazon Music Unlimited | No | Yes | No |
| YouTube Music | No | Yes | No |
| Purchased iTunes downloads (DRM-free) | Limited personal use | Often no DRM | Gray zone |
The iTunes exception matters. Apple stopped adding DRM to purchased music downloads in 2009. If you purchased a track through the iTunes Store and downloaded a DRM-free file, burning that to a CD for personal use sits in the same gray zone as burning from a physical CD you own.
Can You Make a Backup Copy of a CD
Making a backup copy of a CD you own is not explicitly authorized by US copyright law, but it is widely treated as a low-risk personal use activity that falls under fair use principles.
There is no statute that says “you may make one backup copy of a CD you purchased.” The Software Copyright Act allows backup copies of software, but that provision does not extend to music recordings. The backup right for music is an assumed practical tolerance, not a guaranteed legal protection.
What makes a backup copy defensible under fair use:
- You own the original disc
- The backup is for your personal use only
- You do not distribute the copy
- The backup does not substitute for a market purchase
The backup argument weakens significantly if you give away the original after making the copy, sell the original and keep the copy, or make multiple copies under the guise of “backups.”
Backup Copy: What the Law Says
| Factor | Status |
|---|---|
| Explicit statutory right to backup a music CD | Does not exist |
| Fair use as a defense for personal backup | Possible, case-dependent |
| Backing up software you own | Explicitly allowed (17 U.S.C. Section 117) |
| Distributing your “backup” | Illegal |
| Making 10 “backups” of one disc | Not credibly a backup use |
Key Takeaway: Backup copies of music CDs exist in a legal gray zone with no explicit statutory protection, unlike software backups. Keeping one personal copy of a disc you own is low-risk, but it is not a guaranteed right under current law.
Is Ripping CDs to Your Computer Legal
Ripping a CD you own to your computer is legal in most practical circumstances, but it is not unconditionally protected by any specific statute.
Ripping means extracting the audio from a physical CD and converting it into a digital file, typically an MP3 or FLAC, stored on your hard drive. Courts and the music industry have generally accepted this as a personal use activity. The RIAA itself stated in 2006 during the Atlantic v. Howell case that ripping CDs for personal use is acceptable, though that statement was later walked back partially.
The critical limit: ripping is only legal when you own the disc and you do not bypass copy protection to do it.
If the CD has no DRM (most standard retail CDs do not), ripping is practically risk-free for personal use. If the disc has copy protection software that your ripping program bypasses to extract the audio, the DMCA anti-circumvention provision creates exposure.
Ripping vs. Burning: Legal Comparison
| Activity | Owns Original | DRM Bypassed | Legal Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rip personal CD, no DRM | Yes | No | Gray zone, tolerated |
| Rip personal CD, bypass DRM | Yes | Yes | Likely illegal under DMCA |
| Rip borrowed CD | No | No | Likely infringing |
| Rip and upload to sharing platform | Yes | No | Clearly illegal |
| Rip and burn for personal backup | Yes | No | Gray zone, low risk |
Is It Illegal to Burn CDs and Give Them Away
Giving away burned CDs is illegal under federal copyright law, even when you are not charging money for them.
Distribution is the operative legal concept. Copyright holders under 17 U.S.C. Section 106 have the exclusive right to distribute their works. Handing someone a burned copy of a copyrighted album, whether for free or for payment, constitutes distribution without authorization.
The “I didn’t charge for it” defense does not hold up legally. Courts and the RIAA have been clear that the commercial or non-commercial nature of distribution affects penalty severity, but it does not make unauthorized distribution legal.
Where this gets prosecuted in practice: when the scale is large. Someone who burns one disc for a close friend is in a very different practical position than someone who burns hundreds of discs and distributes them at shows, flea markets, or online. Both are technically infringing, but enforcement resources focus on the latter.
Giving Away Burned CDs: Risk Scale
| Scale | Legal Status | Practical Risk |
|---|---|---|
| One copy for one friend | Technically infringing | Very low |
| 10 copies for a group | Infringing | Low to moderate |
| 100 copies distributed publicly | Clear infringement | Moderate to high |
| Large-scale distribution network | Criminal-level infringement | High |
Is Selling Burned CDs Illegal
Selling burned CDs is clearly and unambiguously illegal under federal copyright law and can result in both civil lawsuits and criminal prosecution.
This is not a gray area. Selling unauthorized copies of copyrighted music involves both reproduction (burning the CD) and commercial distribution (selling it) of the copyright holder’s work without permission. Both rights belong exclusively to the copyright holder under 17 U.S.C. Section 106.
The commercial nature of selling burned CDs makes the fair use defense almost completely unavailable. The fourth fair use factor, effect on the market, goes strongly against anyone selling copies that substitute for legitimate purchases.
Criminal prosecution under 17 U.S.C. Section 506 targets willful infringement for commercial advantage or private financial gain. Selling burned CDs fits squarely within that definition. The FBI and DOJ have prosecuted large-scale bootleg CD operations with felony charges.
Selling Burned CDs: Legal Exposure
| Violation Type | Governing Law | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Civil copyright infringement | 17 U.S.C. Section 504 | $750 to $150,000 per work |
| Criminal infringement (commercial) | 17 U.S.C. Section 506 | Up to 5 years prison, fines |
| Trafficking in counterfeit labels | 18 U.S.C. Section 2318 | Up to 5 years prison |
| Large-scale commercial bootlegging | Federal prosecution | Felony charges |
Key Takeaway: Selling burned CDs is a federal crime with real prison time and six-figure civil penalties per song or album. There is no legal gray zone here.
Penalty for Burning CDs Illegally
Penalties for illegally burning CDs range from civil damages starting at $750 per infringed work to criminal sentences of up to 5 years in federal prison for willful commercial infringement.
The gap between “I burned one CD for my friend” and “I ran a bootleg operation” is enormous in practice, but the statutory framework technically applies to both. Courts calibrate penalties based on scale, intent, and commercial nature.
Civil penalties under 17 U.S.C. Section 504:
- Minimum statutory damages: $750 per infringed work
- Maximum statutory damages: $30,000 per infringed work
- Maximum for willful infringement: $150,000 per infringed work
- “Per work” means per song, not per disc
That math adds up fast. A burned CD with 12 songs that is distributed commercially could generate $150,000 x 12 in maximum statutory damages if willfulness is proven. That’s $1.8 million for one disc in a worst-case scenario.
Criminal penalties under 17 U.S.C. Section 506:
- First offense: Up to 5 years imprisonment, fines
- Repeat offenses: Up to 10 years imprisonment
- Threshold for criminal charges: 10 or more copies worth over $2,500 in a 180-day period
Copyright Infringement CD Burning Penalties
Copyright infringement penalties for CD burning are structured to punish distributors and commercial bootleggers far more severely than private users, but private users are not exempt from civil liability.
The RIAA pursued aggressive civil litigation against file-sharers in the 2000s, winning cases like Capitol Records v. Thomas-Rasset (2009), where a jury awarded $1.92 million in damages against one individual for sharing 24 songs. While that case involved digital distribution rather than CD burning, it illustrates how seriously courts have treated music reproduction without authorization.
For CD burning specifically, enforcement trends show:
- Private, non-commercial burners: Rarely if ever targeted
- Friends-and-family distribution: Almost never prosecuted
- Flea market and street bootleggers: Actively targeted by both labels and law enforcement
- Online commercial bootleggers: Federal criminal prosecution
Infringement Penalty Summary
| Infringement Type | Civil Penalty | Criminal Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Innocent infringement | $200 minimum per work | Rarely applicable |
| Standard civil infringement | $750 to $30,000 per work | Not applicable |
| Willful civil infringement | Up to $150,000 per work | Not applicable |
| Criminal (commercial scale) | Civil damages plus | Up to 5 years prison |
| Repeat criminal offender | Civil damages plus | Up to 10 years prison |
Key Takeaway: Copyright infringement penalties for CD burning scale dramatically with commercial intent and distribution scale, but the statutory framework creates real civil exposure even for non-commercial copying when a rights holder chooses to pursue it.
Burning CDs for Personal Use Law 2026
As of 2026, the legal framework governing burning CDs for personal use has not changed materially from prior years. The core statutes remain Title 17 of the United States Code, the DMCA, and the AHRA, all of which were enacted before widespread CD burning existed in its current form.
Congress has not passed a “personal use right” for music copying despite years of discussion. The Copyright Office has acknowledged in reports to Congress that the current law leaves personal copying in a legally uncertain position, but no legislation has closed that gap.
What has changed in the 2020s is the practical relevance of CD burning itself. Streaming now dominates music consumption. Physical CD sales have declined sharply. The RIAA has shifted enforcement resources heavily toward online piracy, streaming manipulation, and AI-generated music disputes.
That shift means the practical risk of CD burning for personal use in 2026 is lower than ever from an enforcement standpoint. The legal framework creating the risk, however, remains fully intact.
Current Legal Status of Personal CD Burning in 2026:
| Legal Question | Current Status |
|---|---|
| Explicit personal use right in statute | Does not exist |
| AHRA protection for computer-based burning | Not available per court rulings |
| Fair use as a defense | Available, case-dependent |
| RIAA enforcement focus in 2026 | Online piracy, AI music, streaming fraud |
| Risk of prosecution for private use | Very low in practice |
| Legal risk if distributing | Unchanged, remains illegal |
Difference Between Ripping and Burning a CD Legally
Ripping and burning are two distinct technical processes with separate legal implications, though both involve interacting with copyrighted audio content.
Ripping means extracting audio from a physical CD and converting it into a digital file on a device. Burning means writing audio files onto a blank CD-R disc. They often happen in sequence: you rip a CD to your computer, then burn those files to a new disc. But legally, they involve different actions and different risk points.
Ripping creates a reproduction stored privately on your device. Burning creates a new physical copy of the reproduced work. Each step is a separate act of reproduction under 17 U.S.C. Section 106.
Ripping vs. Burning: Legal Comparison
| Factor | Ripping | Burning |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Copies audio to digital file | Writes files to new CD |
| Creates a new copy | Yes | Yes |
| Involves distribution | Not inherently | Not inherently |
| Risk if kept private | Low, gray zone | Low, gray zone |
| Risk if shared | Moderate to high | Moderate to high |
| DRM bypass common | Sometimes | Rarely, but possible |
| Legal framework | Section 106, fair use, DMCA | Section 106, fair use |
The practical upshot: ripping and burning your own physical CDs for personal use carry similar legal status. Both are legally gray for private use. Both become illegal when copies are distributed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it illegal to burn a CD for personal use in the US?
Burning a CD for personal use is not explicitly illegal, but it is not explicitly protected by statute either.
Courts treat private, non-commercial copying of CDs you own as a legally gray activity that is unlikely to result in prosecution.
The fair use doctrine provides a potential defense, but it is a defense raised in court rather than a guaranteed legal right.
Can you legally burn a CD for a friend?
Burning a CD for a friend is technically illegal under federal copyright law because it involves unauthorized distribution of a copyrighted work.
The fact that you are not charging money does not make the distribution legal.
Practical enforcement against individuals burning single copies for friends is extremely rare, but the legal exposure exists.
What is the penalty for illegally burning and distributing CDs?
Civil penalties for copyright infringement start at $750 per infringed work and reach up to $150,000 per work for willful violations.
Criminal penalties for commercial-scale infringement reach up to 5 years in federal prison for a first offense.
Large-scale CD bootlegging operations have been prosecuted as federal felonies with substantial sentences and fines.
Does the Audio Home Recording Act protect you when burning CDs?
The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 does not protect most modern CD burning because courts have ruled that computers and CD-R drives are not covered devices under the Act.
The Ninth Circuit confirmed in RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia Systems (1998) that general-purpose computers fall outside the AHRA’s scope.
Only dedicated standalone audio recording devices qualify for AHRA protection, which covers almost no equipment people use today.
Is it legal to burn a CD from music you bought on Spotify or iTunes?
Burning a CD from Spotify is illegal because streaming licenses grant access for listening only, not reproduction.
Burning from DRM-free iTunes purchased tracks sits in the same gray zone as burning from a physical CD you own, permissible for private use but not explicitly authorized.
Any software that captures and converts streaming audio likely violates the DMCA’s anti-circumvention rules regardless of what service it targets.
The legal reality of CD burning in 2026 is a patchwork of decades-old statutes, court interpretations, and enforcement priorities that shifted away from individual consumers years ago. Private personal use carries very low practical risk. Distribution and selling carry real legal consequences.
Bookmark this article for reference any time the question comes up again, whether for yourself or someone else. Copyright law around personal copying hasn’t changed, but knowing exactly where the lines sit keeps you on the right side of them.







